Guides/Pulse Telemetry/ Article
Article3 min read

Your best corner may be on a slower lap

Your quickest lap may contain a corner you rode better earlier in the session. Pulse telemetry and Rider Pro’s Corner pass comparison help you find that earlier attempt, including one hidden in a slower lap. It gives you an example of your own riding that an overall lap ranking can overlook.

Updated

Look beyond the quickest complete lap

Traffic may spoil an otherwise good lap, or one difficult section may cost time after an earlier corner went well. The final time rolls all of that into a single result. For a closer review, Corner pass comparison lets each marked corner use its own quickest pass from the session as the reference.

The references can come from different laps: one corner from lap seven, another from lap three. The other mode uses the passage from your best complete lap for every corner. Switching the reference changes the question you are asking of the session.

Average differences against the selected reference help identify corners to examine, with individual passes available below. You can find the lap containing a good attempt even when it is well down the overall order.

Corner pass comparison using a separate best pass as the reference for each corner.
Each corner has its own best pass as a reference: T13 uses lap 7, T3 uses lap 5 and T7 uses lap 1 in this session.
Corner pass comparison using lap 7, the best complete lap, as the reference for every corner.
The other mode keeps lap 7 as the reference for all corners. Changing the reference can change which corners appear at the top of the list.

What happened through the rest of the turn?

Finding a quick pass is a reason to look at the ride it came from. The separate Corner Analysis table supplies entry, apex and exit readings; its apex reading refers to the slowest point of the detected pass. Those values can help locate a difference that deserves a closer look.

Lap comparison then puts selected attempts together with their paths and time-difference traces. An early advantage may disappear on exit. Following that exchange helps explain why an entry that looked promising did not keep gaining through the passage. A single speed reading would leave out what happened before and after it.

On supported layouts, 3D comparison also makes the recorded paths visible as rides across the width of the circuit. The lap-comparison guide explains bringing the selected laps into that view.

Keep the comparisons in context

Corner pass comparison uses track corner markers, with entry and exit detected separately for each pass from lateral loading. Its timing boundaries can move between attempts. A difference in corner time therefore does not guarantee the same saving on a complete lap; examine the paths and surrounding speed as well.

There is also a separate beta report, Where you lost time in corners. It compares automatically detected flowing sections, which can include linked corners, and may flag a pattern repeated across laps, such as rolling off in the same sequence. These sections differ from the numbered corners in Corner pass comparison.

One view can help recover an overlooked good attempt; the other can draw attention to repetition across the session. Use the report that fits the passage you want to examine, keeping its definition of that passage in mind.

The beta corner time-loss report with explanations and a section-by-lap comparison table.
The separate beta report compares flowing sections. Here it flags a repeated difference through T3–T6 and shows the time differences across laps.

A slower lap can still supply the example

The best complete lap remains a useful measure of the session. It need not be the only ride you study. If an earlier attempt contains the corner you want to repeat, you can keep that whole passage in view, from the approach through to the exit, and see what made it worth finding.